Buying bulls at multivendor sales can be difficult. It is hard to tell if some stock look better because of the feed they are on or because they are genetically superior. Certainly you can visually check structural aspects, temperament and other characteristics, and you may have had experience with some studs or sire lines. A better indicator of likely breeding values, for example on growth rates, milking ability, carcase attributes, female fertility and feed efficiency levels, would be of great help when considering desired characteristics in progeny.
Buying bulls on a property allows better comparison within that herd, but how do you compare these cattle with cattle from other herds?
BREEDPLAN is the Australian and international beef cattle performance recording and evaluation scheme. It has been available since 1985, and there are now more than 2000 seedstock herds enrolled in Australia. Most breeds are represented.
As a testimony to BREEDPLAN’s international standing, most of the New Zealand stud industry is now enrolled, together with the Hereford, Salers, Braunvieh and Shorthorn associations in the United States, and several breeds in South Africa. There are also enrolled herds in Canada, Europe, Thailand, Argentina and Mexico.
BREEDPLAN is a computer-aided system for estimating the breeding values of cattle — hence the estimates are called estimated breeding values (EBVs). This is done by measuring the performance of individual animals, for example for growth, calving ease and carcase attributes, and comparing this performance with that of their contemporaries run in the same conditions. This is, of course, an age-old technique.
What is clever about BREEDPLAN is that sophisticated computer programs are utilised to incorporate information from pedigree records, thereby allowing much more than just the information on an individual animal to be used. The known performances of relatives (parents, brothers, sisters and progeny) are included in the bank of information in order to improve the accuracy of an EBV.
Data on trait correlation is also used. For example, we know that weight gains to yearling and to 2-year-olds generally ‘go together’. If, for example, two bulls weigh similarly at yearling but differ at 2 years of age, the initial yearling EBVs are adjusted a little because BREEDPLAN ‘suspects’ that some random non-genetic events may have influenced the yearling weights. This is later confirmed or otherwise by the performance of progeny, and the EBVs may be further adjusted.
In these and other ways, increasingly accurate estimates of breeding values are progressively made.
GROUP BREEDPLAN allows comparison between herds within a breed. Information from common bulls and cows is used to link and compare across herds . It has rapidly become by far the most commonly used system. BREEDPLAN also offers within-herd analysis.
Most of the major Australian breeds are now in GROUP BREEDPLAN.
Sire and dam summaries are a major feature of GROUP BREEDPLAN. Sires with sufficient genetic links and records have their EBVs published. The example given in Agnote DAI-147 Reading a BREEDPLAN catalogue shows the type of information available in sire summaries, sale catalogues, and websites. An assessment of the progeny of the bulls listed in the catalogue example is also given.
In the exercises that follow, assume that bulls are sound and fertile .
For simplicity, accuracies are not given in Exercises I, II and III; however, they are used in Exercise IV and are discussed in detail in other Agnotes in this series.
Three buyers (buyers 1–3, see below) are selecting from the sire list given in Table 1. Which bull should each buyer choose?
|Bull||Birth-weight||200-day milk||200-day growth||400-day weight||600-day weight||Mature cow weight|
|Breed av. for drop||+2||+3||+12||+28||+35||+46|
Buyer 1 sells vealers but also breeds replacement heifers. Increasing the level of milk production in this herd would improve profitability.
Buyer 2 wants to increase yearling and final weights and avoid calving difficulty. The main product is heavy steers. Replacement heifers are retained.
Buyer 3 is straightbreeding in a harsh environment where cows with high EBVs for milk are slower to rebreed. Large mature cow size is also not favoured. Increased growth rate in 2-year-old steers is sought.
(Note that ‘Calving ease’ and ‘Gestation length’ EBVs are also being provided by some breeds — see Agnote DAI-303 Calving ease EBVs.)
Using the catalogue example given in Table 2, advise each buyer (buyers 1–3, see below) on bull choice. Assume all bulls have adequate scrotal size for the current mating load.
|Bull||400-day weight (kg)||600-day weight (kg)||SS (cm)||DC (days)|
|Breed av. for drop||+36||+43||+0.4||0|
Buyer 1 has a commercial purebred herd turning off 2-year-old steers, and seeks to improve female fertility while maintaining heavy steer weights.
Buyer 2 intends to use the bull as a terminal cross over crossbred cows, selling both the heifers and steers as finished yearlings.
Buyer 3 wishes to increase scrotal size in this stud herd. Yearling bulls are sold; in the past, some have been marginal for scrotal size. This buyer’s clients are predominantly breeders of yearling steers.
BREEDPLAN is also actively involved in collecting data on carcase traits. Commercial scanning services accredited by breed societies are available to measure the following on live cattle :
Most breeds produce the above EBVs, along with the following EBVs:
Wherever possible, BREEDPLAN also collects abattoir carcase data, particularly on marbling and other meat quality factors, to contribute to these EBVs. Overseas information on sires of some breeds is ‘imported’ to further strengthen the Australian analysis.
The improvement of these carcase EBVs has recently accelerated, as data from the Cooperative Research Centre (CRC) has contributed to the design of the BREEDPLAN carcase EBV system used since 1999 (all CRC cattle have BREEDPLAN links). Since 2000, carcase EBVs have been predictions of the differences expected in a 300 kg steer carcase, that is, at a weight end point (rather than to the ‘age end point’ used up until 1999).
Table 3 gives carcase trait EBVs for a selection of sires from a British breed catalogue. Which bull should each of buyers 1 and 2 buy?
|Bull||400-day weight (kg)||600-day weight (kg)||Rump fat (mm)||EMA (cm2)||EMY (%)||IMF (%)|
|Breed av. for drop||+52||+68||+0.2||+1.6||0||0|
Buyer 1 sells yearling steers to a feedlot which is long-term feeding for Japan, and has been advised to increase size and growth to 2 years, reduce fatness, maintain or improve muscularity, and improve marbling.
Buyer 2 breeds yearling steers from European × Dairy cows. This buyer has difficulty in finishing yearling steers, and seeks to improve on this.
Calving ease EBVs are currently available for several breeds, with other breeders collecting data for later analysis. These are developed from birthweight, gestation length and calving ease records.
Calving ease is scored by the breeder. The scores differ a little according to the breed; they are generally:
Calving ease EBVs are expressed as:
than calving ease for base animals. That is, positive figures (+) indicate better calving ease.
In this exercise, percentage accuracy figures are also given.
Advise the following buyers on their bull choice according to the information given in Table 4.
|Sire||Birthweight||400-day weight||Calving ease (%)|
Buyer 1 seeks a terminal sire to join with crossbred heifers for yearling production. Calving ease is of moderate importance.
Buyer 2 is straightbreeding for yearling production and wishes to improve calving ease of the females.
Buyer 3 is straightbreeding and seeks a sire to join with heifers. Calving ease is of considerable concern to this breeder of grass-finished yearlings.
As well as assisting bull buyers, BREEDPLAN also plays an important role in the fields of artificial insemination (AI) and embryo transfer (ET). These techniques result in ‘superior’ genetics being quickly spread, so it is imperative that only top cattle are used. Whether it is growth rate, fertility, carcase traits or calving ease that is important to the bull buyer, GROUP BREEDPLAN will greatly assist in the identification of suitable cattle.
|Buyer 1:||Bull D. The high milk EBV is the deciding factor.|
|Buyer 2:||Bull A. High 400-day and 600-day weight EBVs, with low birthweight EBV and positive milk EBV.|
|Buyer 3:||Bull E. Adequate 600-day weight EBV and low milk EBV. Neutral birthweight EBV and moderate mature cow weight EBV.|
|Buyer 1:||Bull A. The highest priority is the negative (fewer) days to calving EBV, and 600-day weight EBV is also good.|
|Buyer 2:||Bull D. Fertility EBVs relating to progeny are not important for terminal sires, so highest 400-day weight EBV is selected.|
|Buyer 3:||Bull E. Has the highest scrotal size EBV and a good 400-day weight EBV.|
|Buyer 1:||Bull C. Fat EBV is negative, and eye muscle, percentage yield and percentage IMF EBVs are positive. 600-day weight EBV is also high.|
|Buyer 2:||Bull A or Bull D. Fat EBVs are positive. Best 400-day weight EBVs.|
|Buyer 1:||Bull B. Positive calving ease direct EBV, with moderate accuracy and good 400-day weight EBV.|
Note: Bull A has a similar, but lower accuracy, calving ease direct EBV, and low 400-day weight EBV.
|Buyer 2:||Bull C. Positive calving ease daughters EBV, with acceptable 400-day weight EBV.|
|Buyer 3:||Bull D. Positive calving ease direct EBV with the highest accuracy, as calving ease is critical.|
See other Agnotes in this series for further information on BREEDPLAN and EBVs.
Brian Sundstrom is Cattle Breeding Coordinator with NSW Agriculture. Part of this role involves technical specialist and advisory work with BREEDPLAN from an office at the Agricultural Business Research Institute (ABRI) at Armidale. His other role is with the Beef CRC group.