• Home
  • Agriculture
  • Fishing and aquaculture
  • Forests
  • Minerals and petroleum
  • About us and our services
A-Z INDEX | SEARCH | CONTACT US
New South Wales Department of Primary Industries subsite home
Home »  Archive - Agriculture Today  »  March 2008

Research says removing trees reduces rain

From the March 2008 edition of Agriculture Today.

'When trees are removed, heat is reflected rather than absorbed, which means less moisture evaporates into the atmosphere and, in the long run, less rain falls'.

Three years ago I wrote in this column about research that showed land clearing in Western Australia’s southwest had contributed to the region’s plummeting rainfall.

Since then US research has found that deforestation in one area influences rain elsewhere.

Deforestation in the Amazon reduces rain in Mexico; land clearing in Central Africa reduces rain in the US Midwest, and forest removal in south-east Asia affects rainfall in China and Europe’s Balkan peninsula.

Removing trees affects the amount of heat and moisture released into the atmosphere; this changes air pressure and circulation patterns, and sends storm systems off their typical paths.

Now Queensland research has concluded that 150 years of land clearing has added significantly to the warming and drying of eastern Australia.

A team led by Dr Clive McAlpine from the University of Queensland says the 2002-03 El Nino drought in eastern Australia was on average two degrees hotter because of the land clearing, and the region’s average summer rainfall has decreased between four and 12 per cent for the same reason.

The link between tree clearing and rain is due to heat and moisture transfer to the atmosphere.

Trees access water deep in the ground and hold the moisture in their canopies. They absorb sunlight and emit heat which creates thermal currents that take the moisture from the leaves up into the atmosphere, where it condenses as rain.

When trees are removed, heat is reflected rather than absorbed, which means less moisture evaporates into the atmosphere and, in the long run, less rain falls.

Other US research has found that regional climate is impacted by the type of land use after clearing.

Areas left with bare ground had the most profound impact, raising temperatures up to two degrees. Croplands had the second most significant climate impact, followed by pastures.

Clive McAlpine says the message from the research is clear.

"We need to recognise that the land surface and how we manage the land has a strong feedback to the climate and that’s going to become even more important as our climate changes," he said.

You can read his team’s research paper Modelling impacts of vegetation cover change on regional climate at http://www.omc.uq.edu.au/news/documents/ModellingImpactsVegetationCover.pdf

- Rebecca Lines-Kelly



agtoday logo

This article appears in the March 2008 edition of Agriculture Today.

  • Archive - Agriculture Today
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • February 2007
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006
    • July 2006
    • June 2006
    • May 2006
    • April 2006
    • March 2006
    • February 2006
    • December 2005
    • November 2005
    • October 2005
    • September 2005
  • Archive - Bush Telegraph Magazine
  • Archive - Good news from the bush
  • Archive - News releases
Privacy | Legal | Report a problem
© State of New South Wales, 2005 | ServiceNSW