• Home
  • Agriculture
  • Fishing and aquaculture
  • Forests
  • Minerals and petroleum
  • About us and our services
A-Z INDEX | SEARCH | CONTACT US
New South Wales Department of Primary Industries subsite home
Home »  Archive - Agriculture Today  »  September 2007

Early cut makes a critical difference

From the September 2007 edition of Agriculture Today.

Trial work recorded in the Successful Silage manual - the best text on silage making you could possibly find - shows a dramatic change in cattle production if delays are made in cutting fodder.

Next month we should see livestock producers come up with as much conserved fodder as possible in the form of silage and hay and the key consideration is how to get it cut and stored as early as possible in the season.

Cutting earlier usually means you’ll get less of it per hectare but its quality and the subsequent livestock performance will be better. Most reserves are very low, thanks to the dry seasons we’ve had, particularly last year as well as this autumn and winter.

The rain we get over September and October will have a big effect on the amount of fodder made.

Whether it’s silage or hay, all the data shows that the earlier the forage is cut, the better the quality.

Younger, less mature plants are higher in digestibility, energy and protein, and lower in fibre.

When this is related to livestock production, and there’s not many other reasons to make the stuff, the earlier cut fodder produces better results.

In one trial documented in the Successful Silage manual, silage was cut when the plant was at boot stage, and a replicate paddock cut two weeks later.

Both were fed to 300 kilogram steers and their intake and weight gain recorded.

Everything else being equal, the steers on the early cut ate more and gained 1.14 kilograms a day.

The steers fed the later cut silage ate less and gained only 0.65 kg/day.

These are dramatic differences in weight gain and hence profitability.

They were due to differences in quality, particularly digestibility.

Yet many producers would not consider a difference of only 14 days delay in cutting too significant.

Often the first seven days can be slowed up by a machinery breakdown or a contractor delay.

This trial also reflected why cattle generally don’t do as well on pasture hay as on pasture silage.

It’s related to the substantial difference in quality of the two products.

- Brian Cumming



agtoday logo

This article appears in the September 2007 edition of Agriculture Today.

  • Archive - Agriculture Today
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • February 2007
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006
    • July 2006
    • June 2006
    • May 2006
    • April 2006
    • March 2006
    • February 2006
    • December 2005
    • November 2005
    • October 2005
    • September 2005
  • Archive - Bush Telegraph Magazine
  • Archive - Good news from the bush
  • Archive - News releases
Privacy | Legal | Report a problem
© State of New South Wales, 2005 | ServiceNSW