The NSW Biosecurity Strategy introduces the concept of shared responsibility. The Strategy's vision is:
'Government, industry and the people of NSW working together to protect the economy, environment and community from the negative impacts of animal and plant pests, diseases and weeds for the benefit of the people of NSW.'
Government is committed to reducing red tape and strengthening relationships, in order to drive economic growth, productivity and innovation and create positive business environments. Industry and community stakeholders can play a proactive role in developing and implementing solutions to effectively manage our biosecurity risks.
To provide a framework for the responsibility for biosecurity risk management to be shared among the community, industry and government, the Biosecurity Act establishes a number of 'biosecurity duties'. These are:
The general biosecurity duty (GBD) supports the concept of shared responsibility through its broad scope. It increases flexibility in how we can manage animal and plant pests and diseases and contaminants and provides a strong foundation for a proactive and outcome-focused framework based on education and advisory processes instead of the current prescriptive regulatory one.
The GBD can be found in Part 3 of the Act. Specifically, section 22 of the Act provides:
Any person who deals with biosecurity matter or a carrier and who knows, or ought reasonably to know, the biosecurity risk posed or likely to be posed by the biosecurity matter, carrier or dealing has a biosecurity duty to ensure that, so far as is reasonably practicable, the biosecurity risk is prevented, eliminated or minimised.
The terms 'biosecurity matter', 'carrier', 'biosecurity impact', 'biosecurity risk' and other important terms are defined in Division 2 of Part 2 of the Act and an explanation provided in Key terms and definitions.
Although the GBD applies broadly, there are a number of elements that must be satisfied:
The GBD can apply to more than one person in relation to the same biosecurity risk, for example an owner and a manager may both be responsible for managing a particular biosecurity risk on a property.
The GBD will be an important part of education programs about specific biosecurity issues. Advice given to individuals can refer to the GBD in order to lend more legal weight to information that previously would have been seen as purely advisory.
Biosecurity and Food Safety NSW, Local Control Authorities and Local Land Services provide a large number of factsheets about the management of various types of biosecurity risks. These will be updated to include the GBD and information on how a person can meet their duties in relation to the matter.
A greater awareness of the GBD across the community will reinforce the important principle that responsibility for biosecurity is shared between the public, industry and government.
The GBD exists regardless of whether the particular risk, or the actions to prevent, eliminate or minimise it, are specifically addressed elsewhere in the Act, regulations or other subordinate instruments.
The GBD can also be considered as a 'safety net', which can be used for any biosecurity risk not specifically dealt with elsewhere in the legislation.
Regulations made under the Biosecurity Act may specify actions that must be taken to prevent eliminate or minimise biosecurity risks posed or likely to be posed in relation to biosecurity matter, carriers or dealings. These are known as mandatory measures.
Mandatory measures may apply generally or only in specified circumstances such as only to certain classes of people or in relation to certain activities. If mandatory measures apply to a particular dealing or activity then the relevant person must comply with those measures, regardless of whether they know or ought to know about the risks posed or likely to be posed.
In most cases, if a person complies with the relevant mandatory measures they will have discharged their GBD. In some cases the mandatory measures may state the minimum actions that are required for the GBD to be discharged, and that depending on the circumstances additional measures may also be required.
A mandatory measure may be outcomes based or more prescriptive in nature. For example, a mandatory measure may require farm machinery to be free of weed seeds before being moved from a property. This approach gives individuals flexibility in how they achieve the outcome, while still ensuring that the biosecurity risk is addressed. Alternatively the mandatory measure could require that specified parts of the machinery are to be washed with a high pressure hose, at a particular type of location and in a specified manner.
Mandatory measures may be prescribed to highlight particular risks and how they should be addressed. Industry will be given the opportunity to participate in the development of mandatory measures. By focusing on a desired outcome, mandatory measures can be a tool to engage industry, increase the awareness of shared responsibility and encourage innovation in how to prevent, eliminate or minimise a particular biosecurity risk.
If extensive or detailed requirements for a particular type of biosecurity matter, carrier or dealing are needed, the mandatory measures may refer to compliance with, for example, a code of practice or set of procedures developed by an industry body or state or local government. Such a document would only be adopted if it was enforceable, reasonable and consistent with the government's commitment to red tape reduction.
By giving industry the opportunity to participate in the development of mandatory measures and by focusing on a required outcome, mandatory measures are a tool to engage industry, increase awareness of shared responsibility and provide opportunities for co-regulation.
In many cases there will be no need to prescribe exactly how a person is to discharge their GBD. The person with the GBD will be best placed to decide what is reasonably practicable in the circumstances to prevent, eliminate or minimise the particular biosecurity risk and should have the flexibility to make this decision him or herself.
There will also often be relevant advisory material, industry standards and codes of practice available that may be of assistance. Additionally, authorised officers will be able to give guidance on appropriate ways to discharge a GBD and in some cases may also issue a biosecurity direction to the person that provides more detail of what the person must do.
It is anticipated that the existence of an enforceable GBD will be invaluable in raising awareness through education and advisory material and attaining long term outcomes.
Section 23 of the Biosecurity Act provides 2 tiers of offences for failing to discharge the GBD. The more serious offence (category 1) applies where a person's failure to discharge their GBD was intentional or reckless, and the failure caused (or was likely to cause) a significant biosecurity impact.
Any other failure to discharge a GBD is a category 2 offence which has lower penalties. Failure to comply with a mandatory measure is also a category 2 offence under section 25 of the Biosecurity Act.
Failure to comply with a biosecurity direction is also a category 2 offence.
Horse owners have a GBD to ensure that the biosecurity risks associated with keeping horses are prevented, eliminated or minimised.
These horse owners are dealing with biosecurity matter as they are keeping horses. They also would know or ought reasonably know about the biosecurity risks associated with keeping horses, particularly if they are in an area such as Northern NSW where Hendra virus infection is a higher risk.
These horse owners therefore have a GDB to prevent, eliminate or minimise the biosecurity risks associated with Hendra virus infection. This could be as simple as keeping horses away from trees in which fruit bats roost and making sure that the horses' food and water is not near these trees. The horse owner may also choose to vaccinate the horses against Hendra virus infection.
If a weed poses a biosecurity risk in a particular area, but is not the subject of any specific legislation, authorised officers of Local Control Authorities in that area may rely on the GBD to manage that weed or prevent its spread. A Regional Weeds Committee would normally prepare guidelines or factsheets to guide the public in the best practice management and control of the weed.
As in all situations, the GBD only applies to persons who deal with the particular weed or a carrier of that weed and who have knowledge or ought reasonably to have knowledge of the biosecurity risks associated with that weed.
If the GBD applies, typically, property owners might be required to discharge the GBD by controlling the movement of weeds onto and off their land, for example by:
Information would be made available to property owners about ways to control the spread of a particular weed. However, in this example, property owners are not required to follow any particular method so long as reasonably practicable measures to control the spread of the weed are taken.
Under the Biosecurity Act the invasive aquatic weed Caulerpa is likely to be subject to regulatory controls to prevent its spread from estuaries in which it has been known to occur. The most recent survey found it at 4 locations out of 14 where it had previously been found. It is however extremely difficult to completely eradicate and could reappear at any of those 14 locations or indeed new locations.
Recreational waterway users are a potential vector of Caulerpa. They have been the subject of a targeted education program but do not currently have obligations under the legislation.
Caulerpa is also subject to a prohibition on possession and sale that restricts chiefly the aquarium trade and also commercial fishing and aquaculture activities in affected estuaries.
Since water is a carrier of Caulerpa, recreational users of affected waterways who have knowledge of the biosecurity risks of Caulerpa will be subject to a general biosecurity duty to prevent or minimise the spread of Caulerpa.
Additionally, recreational users of affected waterways who ought reasonably know of the biosecurity risks of Caulerpa will be subject to this GBD. Such users ought to know of the risks if, for example, educational and warning signs are prominently placed at boat ramps and other areas where the water is accessed for recreational purposes warning of the biosecurity risk of this weed and outlining the steps that should be taken by users of the waterway.
Recreational users of an affected waterway who have a GBD in relation to Caulerpa can discharge this duty simply by cleaning their boating, fishing, swimming and other equipment of any water weed before using it in other waterways.
Footrot is a serious, highly contagious disease, which historically has caused social division in communities and sensitivity around animal welfare issues. Currently NSW is largely free of footrot, although sporadic outbreaks still occur, largely as a result of the movement of stock into the state. Specific regulatory controls for footrot include:
These controls will be achieved by a biosecurity zone covering the whole of NSW.
Additionally, if footrot is diagnosed in a flock, a biosecurity direction may be issued or a biosecurity undertaking may be accepted, possibly followed by a control order, to effectively quarantine the affected property, treat the outbreak and apply other measures if necessary.
However, the general biosecurity duty will also apply from the time the disease is first suspected. The owner of stock that are suspected or confirmed as having footrot is clearly dealing with the stock and would usually know or ought reasonably to know of the associated biosecurity risks. Accordingly, he or she has a GBD to ensure that the biosecurity risk is prevented, eliminated or minimised. All reasonably practicable measures must be taken to ensure that potentially infected sheep or goats cannot stray onto neighbouring properties, come into contact with uninfected stock, or have access to land that might be used by uninfected stock, such as public roads.