A NSW Government website

Road crossing remediation


Road (waterway) crossings such as bridges, roads, causeways, and culverts provide access for road vehicles, rail, pedestrians and stock movement.

Just as waterways vary in their size and shape, so too do waterway crossings. Not surprisingly, the potential impact of these crossings on fish passage can vary as much as the structures themselves, especially if they are not designed to cater for migrating fish.

A primary objective of strategic planning should be to minimise the number of crossings and retain open, accessible waterways for migrating and moving fish. Where existing crossings are no longer needed, they should be removed or rehabilitated so that they allow for fish passage.

All new crossings should be designed to minimise impacts on fish and maximise public safety. Replacement of causeways with box culverts or bridges improves fish passage and public safety, and reduces the burden to emergency services through fewer call outs during high river / flood events.



Fish friendly crossings are waterway crossings that are designed to minimise impacts on native fish. Unfortunately, even ‘fish friendly’ crossings can impact some fish where debris collects in or on the structure or there are changes to the surrounding river system over time. It is therefore important to regularly assess road crossing structures and undertake routine maintenance to ensure the structures are working as they were originally designed.

The table below is taken from the Policy and guidelines for fish habitat conservation and management (2013 Update) and indicates DPIRD Fisheries’ recommendation for the most appropriate crossing type for the different classes of waterway in NSW.



Waterway ClassificationMinimum Recommended Crossing TypeAdditional Design Information
Class 1
Major key fish habitat
Bridge, arch structure or tunnelBridges are preferred to arch structures
Class 2
Moderate key fish habitat
Bridge, arch structure, culvert[1] or fordBridges are preferred to arch structures, box culverts and fords (in that order)
Class 3
Minimal key fish habitat
Culvert[2] or fordBox culverts are preferred to fords and pipe culverts (in that order)
Class 4
Unlikely key fish habitat
Culvert[3],causeway or fordCulverts and fords are preferred to causeways (in that order)


[1] High priority given to the ‘High Flow Design’ procedures presented for the design of these culverts—refer to the “Design Considerations” section of Fairfull and Witheridge (2003).

[2] Minimum culvert design using the ‘Low Flow Design’ procedures; however, ‘High Flow Design’ and ‘Medium Flow Design’ should be given priority where affordable—refer to the “Design Considerations” section of Fairfull and Witheridge (2003).

[3] Fish friendly waterway crossing designs possibly unwarranted. Fish passage requirements should be confirmed with NSW DPI.

It should be noted that there are additional factors that must be taken into consideration by those involved in waterway crossing design and construction, including public safety, social and budgetary constraints. Each crossing is therefore assessed by NSW DPIRD Fisheries on a case-by-case basis.



Requirements of works in waterways

The restoration of fish passage throughout NSW waters is a key aspect of NSW DPIRD Fisheries' commitment to improving aquatic ecology and biodiversity.

The Fisheries Management Act 1994 includes provisions to ensure the maintenance and restoration of fish passage as part of the construction of new, or the modification of existing, in-stream structures. As such, works relating to a road crossing should follow guidance provided in NSW DPIRD Fisheries' Policy and guidelines for fish habitat conservation and management (2013 update) and may require a permit from NSW DPIRD Fisheries.