You searched for `identification of marine protected areas`
Showing results 61 - 70 of 138
The size composition data obtained from landed catches were also very consistent between the different areas of the fishery. ... In late July catches were made by Sydney based trawlers and some small catches (less than the 200 kg trip limit) were
Summary During the 2014/2015 watering year 28, 483 ML of Commonwealth and NSW environmental water was delivered to the Macquarie River and core areas of the northern and southern marshes ... Multivariate analyses of the fish assemblage composition were
commercial shipping lanes, ACMA cable exclusion zones, marine protected areas), location of suitable substrata to support the structure, distribution of habitats, avoidance of locations supporting threatened species, and other coastal and.
9. Fish community structure of the Nepean River before and after fishway construction. ... Estuarine/marine vagrants. Acanthopagrus australis ACAAUS Yellowfin bream .
162. First published April 2023. ISSN 2204-8669. More information. Julian Hughes, Fisheries NSW, Sydney Institute of Marine Science, 19 Chowder Bay Road, Mosman, NSW 2088, Australia. ... Other sources of bias include inaccurate species identification and
ISSN 2204-8669. More information. Julian Hughes, Fisheries NSW, Sydney Institute of Marine Science, 19 Chowder Bay Road, Mosman, NSW 2088, Australia. ... As logbook data is self-reported by fishers, it can be subject to inaccurate species identification,
Thanks to Dr Lachlan Barnes, Dr Paul Butcher, Oliver Silver, Daniel Johnson and all of the NSW DPI staff based at Sydney Institute of Marine Science for their helpful guidance and ... many marine protected areas (MPAs – e.g.
4.2 Discussion of the appropriateness of the current minimum legal length.34. ... 97/126 Length and age composition of commercial kingfish landings, Stewart et al.
9 1.2. Electronic monitoring of freshwater fish using hydroacoustics. 10 1.3. ... A preliminary assessment of a dual-frequency identification sonar (DIDSON) system in the Murray-Darling Basin demonstrated substantial promise (Baumgartner et al., 2006).
for each geomorphic zone.37 Table 15. Comparison of areas predicted suitable for seagrass that have seagrass already present,. ... This layer had values ranging from 0 to 25 indicating areas where each of the predictions overlapped.